A Perspective on PPs 2312 Adjuncts or Complements ?
نویسنده
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Distinguishing Complements from Adjuncts using Memory-Based Learning
The automatic distinction between complements and adjuncts, i.e. between subcategorized and non-subcategorized constituents, is crucial for the automatic acquisition of subcategorization lexicons from corpora. In this paper we present memory-based learning experiments for the task of distinguishing complements from adjuncts. Data is extracted from the part-of-speech tagged and parsed version of...
متن کاملBetween VP Adjuncts and Second Pole in Dutch. A corpus based survey regarding the complements between VP adjuncts and second pole in Dutch
In Dutch, verbs are situated at fixed places in the sentence. Those places are called the first and second pole. VP adjuncts seem to function as some kind of pivot place in between these poles. This article investigates, by means of corpus research in the Spoken Dutch Corpus (CGN), which elements are intervening between these VP adjuncts and the second pole. Attention is particularly paid to th...
متن کاملAdjunct Roles and External Predication
0. Introduction This paper addresses one of the linking problems involving prepositional phrases (PPs) especially those involving beneficiary for, and argues that such PPs are best analyzed as adjunct PPs. In this paper I propose that external predication is more appropriate for these PPs than Wechsler's (1995) argument-annexing approach. The argument and analysis put forth in this paper assume...
متن کاملRunning Head: ARGUMENT STATUS AND PP-ATTACHMENT Argument Status and PP-Attachment
Prepositional phrase attachment was investigated in temporarily ambiguous sentences. Both attachment site (noun phrase or verb phrase) and argument status (argument or adjunct) were manipulated to test the hypothesis that arguments are processed differently than adjuncts. Contrary to this hypothesis, some previous research suggested that arguments and adjuncts are initially processed in the sam...
متن کاملIntegrating Linguistic Dimensions: The Scope of Adverbs
Three distinctions seem relevant for the scope properties of adverbs: their function (adjuncts or complements), their prosody (incidental or integrated) and their lexical semantics (parenthetical or non parenthetical). We propose an analysis in which the scope of French adverbs is aligned with their syntactic properties, relying on a view of adjuncts as loci for quantification, a linearization ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2007